THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was
not written for publication in a law journal and (2) is not binding
precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 24
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte ALAIN FARGUES and MANI KIMIAVI
____________
Appeal No. 1997-3850
Application No. 08/355,973
____________
ON BRIEF
____________
Before HAIRSTON, KRASS, and LALL, Administrative Patent Judges.
KRASS, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on appeal from the final rejection of
claims 1, 5, 6, 10 and 11. Claims 2 through 4, 7 through 9 and
12 have been indicated by the examiner as being drawn to
allowable subject matter and are not before us on appeal.
The invention pertains to digital signal transmission
systems. More particularly, the determination of energy per
bit to noise spectral density ratio (Eb/No), a measure of
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007