The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not
written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 17
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte KWANG H. LEE
____________
Appeal No. 1997-3853
Application No. 08/196,658
____________
ON BRIEF1
____________
Before THOMAS, KRASS, and GROSS, Administrative Patent Judges.
GROSS, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on appeal from the examiner's final
rejection of claims 1 through 3, which are all of the claims
pending in this application.
Appellant's invention relates to a phase control
apparatus for a video cassette recorder which includes an
1We note the Request for Oral Hearing filed July 17,
1997. However, as we have already reviewed the case and
decided to reverse, we consider the request moot.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007