Ex parte PARK - Page 2




          Appeal No. 1997-3856                                                        
          Application No. 08/313,794                                                  


          Claim 8 is illustrative of the claimed invention, and it reads              
          as follows:                                                                 
               8.   A printing apparatus which prints an image on a                   
          sheet by thermally pressing an ink ribbon with a printing                   
          head, said printing apparatus comprising:                                   
               a motor;                                                               
               a driving roller driven by said motor;                                 
               a driven roller spaced apart from said driving roller by               
          a predetermined distance;                                                   
               a belt wound around said driving roller and said driven                
          roller;                                                                     
               a head conveyor located above said belt and having a                   
          printing head;                                                              
               means for conveying said head conveyor; and                            
               means for controlling said head conveyor to cause                      
          printing from a leading edge of a sheet to a bottom edge of                 
          said sheet when said sheet is disposed on said belt.                        
               No prior art references of record are relied upon by the               
          examiner in rejecting the appealed claims.                                  
               Claims 8 through 17 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 112,              
          second paragraph, as being indefinite.                                      
               Reference is made to the Examiner's Answer (Paper No. 16,              
          mailed August 5, 1997) for the examiner's complete reasoning                
          in support of the rejection, and to appellant's Brief (Paper                

                                          2                                           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007