Appeal No. 1997-3857 Application No. 08/220,286 illustrative of the claimed invention, and it reads as follows: 1. A thermistor device comprising: a thermistor element body; an ohmic electrode provided on a major surface of said thermistor element body with its outer peripheral edge positioned within an outer peripheral edge of said thermistor element body, thereby defining a gap portion; and an insulating coating formed at said gap portion at least where said outer peripheral edge of said ohmic electrode is in contact with said thermistor element body, said outer peripheral edge of said thermistor body being free of said insulating coating. The prior art reference of record relied upon by the examiner in rejecting the appealed claims is: Shikama et al. (Shikama) 5,210,516 May 11, 1993 Claims 1 through 8 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being unpatentable over Shikama. Reference is made to the Examiner's Answer (Paper No. 19, mailed April 16, 1997) for the examiner's complete reasoning in support of the rejection, and to appellant's Brief (Paper No. 18, filed March 5, 1997) for appellant's arguments thereagainst. OPINION 2Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007