Appeal No. 1997-3897 Page 3
Application No. 08/458,930
Claims 1, 2, 4 and 11 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. §
103 as being unpatentable over Norris in view of the
collective teachings of Carpenter and Hackler, and further
taken with Thompson.
Claims 5 to 7 and 16 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103
as being unpatentable over the references as applied to claim
1 above, and further in view of Kliene.
Claim 8 stands rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being
unpatentable over the references as applied to claim 7 above,
and further in view of Fryer.
Claims 9, 10, 12 and 13 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. §
103 as being unpatentable over the references as applied to
claim 1 or 11 above, and further in view of Weisbart.
Claims 14 and 15 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as
being unpatentable over the references as applied to claim 1
above, and further in view of Culp.
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007