The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board. Paper No. 25 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE __________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES __________ Ex parte B. RAGHAVA REDDY and EDWAR S. SHAMSHOUM __________ Appeal No. 1997-3908 Application 08/174,997 ___________ ON BRIEF ___________ Before GARRIS, WARREN, and OWENS, Administrative Patent Judges. OWENS, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL This is an appeal from the examiner’s refusal to allow claims 1-46 as amended after final rejection. These are all of the claims in the application. THE INVENTION Appellants claim a process for polymerizing propylene in 1Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007