Appeal No. 1997-3909 Application 08/430,090 (Reply brief-page 11.) We assume the “universally recognized” advantages, missing evidence thereof, are multi-speed speech. We assume this because APA teaches the advantage of help information in speech form. Thus, it seems clear to us that the evidence of the desirability of multi- speed speech is in Yabuuchi itself, e.g., fast forward of a tape recorder (page 2, lines 13, 14). We are unconvinced by Appellant’s repeated arguments that Yabuuchi is devoid of help messages which in turn are ancillary to the main function of the device. Everything in claim 10 prior to “the improvement comprising:”, a Jepson claim, is admitted prior art (APA). Ethicon Endo-Surgery Inc. v. U.S. Surgical Corp., 93 F.3d 1572, 1577, 40 USPQ2d 1019, 1022-23 (Fed. Cir. 1996). The APA clearly teaches the help messages (in speech form) which in turn are ancillary to the main function of the device. Appellant has not disputed the APA being the first part of a Jepson claim. The Examiner relies on Yabuuchi for making the speech multi-speed, for the advantages incumbent therein. Furthermore, Appellant’s own specification recites an example of the invention as -8-Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007