THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1)
was not written for publication in a law journal and (2) is
not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 34
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
_____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
_____________
Ex parte CHISATO KATO,
TAKAHIRO KOBAYASHI,
and KAZUO KITAO
_____________
Appeal No. 1997-3912
Application 08/016,979
______________
ON BRIEF
_______________
Before THOMAS, MARTIN, and LALL, Administrative Patent Judges.
THOMAS, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
Appellants have appealed to the Board from the examiner's
final rejection of claims 39 through 42. As of the decision
date of this appeal, the examiner has indicated the
allowability of claims 1 through 29, 31 through 38 and 45
through 52, appellants having canceled claims 30, 43 and 44.
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007