Ex parte DEMASTER et al. - Page 7




          Appeal No. 97-3926                                                          
          Application 08/481,091                                                      

               playing take place has not been specified and the                      
               components [being] cleaned also have not been specified.               
               The transport components of Siddiq are permitted to be                 
               cleaned at the exact same time as the playing of recorded              
               signals since the portion of tape with the recorded                    
               signals will contact the magnetic head when the cleaning               
               portion contacts a transport component.  See column 2,                 
               lines 15-16 of Siddiq.  [Answer at 3.]                                 
          These cited lines in Siddiq state that "one or more cleaning                
          segments clean the magnetic head, and other transport                       
          components."  The examiner's contention that the component                  
          being cleaned is not specified in the claim is incorrect.  As               
          appellants correctly note (Brief at 6), the claim language in               
          question calls for "simultaneous head cleaning and playing of               
          recorded signals" (appellants' emphasis).                                   
               At pages 6 and 7 of the Answer, the examiner for the                   
          first time offers an alternative rationale for reading this                 
          claim language on Siddiq.  Citing a dictionary definition of                
          "simultaneous" to mean "at the same time" and a dictionary                  
          definition of "time" to mean "[a]n interval separating two                  
          points. . . ," the examiner contends that the claim language                
          is broad enough to read on a length of tape which includes                  
          successive diagnostic/informational and cleaning segments.                  
          Although this new rationale has not been addressed by                       
          appellants, who did not file a reply brief, we have considered              

                                        - 7 -                                         





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007