Appeal No. 1997-3930 Application 08/394,596 The Examiner relies on the following references: Silvus et al. (Silvus) 4,352,983 Oct. 5, 1982 Schnell et al. (Schnell) 4,620,284 Oct. 28, 1986 Fuller et al. (Fuller) 4,955,689 Sept. 11, 1990 Minekane1 56-107149 Aug. 25, 1981 (Japan) Claims 1 and 3 through 5 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being unpatentable over Silvus in view of Minekane and Fuller. Claim 2 stands rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being unpatentable over Silvus, Minekane and Fuller and further in view of Schnell. Rather than reiterate the arguments of Appellants and the Examiner, reference is made to the brief and answer for the respective details thereof. OPINION We will not sustain the rejection of claims 1 through 5 1Translated by the Ralph McElory Translation Co. on October 1997. Copy provided to Appellants. 4Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007