Appeal No. 1997-3977 Application No. 08/267,579 Accordingly, the problems solved are sufficiently different so as to fail the second criteria outlined above. Therefore, we see no reason why the skilled artisan would turn to Wakabayashi to cure the deficiencies of Roth. Consequently, the examiner has failed to establish a prima facie case of obviousness. Thus, we cannot sustain the rejection of claims 1 through 15. CONCLUSION 8Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007