Ex parte NUMATA - Page 4




          Appeal No. 1997-4047                                       Page 4           
          Application No. 08/309,508                                                  




               Claim 1, which is representative for our purposes,                     
          follows:                                                                    
                    1.   An apparatus for converting color signals                    
               comprising:                                                            
                    means for converting color signals in a first                     
               color space into corresponding color signals in a                      
               second color space,                                                    
                    means for reconverting converted color signals                    
               in said second color space into corresponding color                    
               signals in said first color space, and                                 
                    means for compensating at least one of said                       
               converted color signals in said second color space                     
               in order to confine each component of reconverted                      
               color signals in said first color space in a dynamic                   
               range allowable for said component.                                    
               Besides the appellant’s admitted prior art (AAPA), the                 
          references relied on in rejecting the claims follow:                        
          Walowit                4,941,038                 Jul. 10, 1990              
          McColl et al. (McColl) “Compression of colour image date using              
          histogram analysis and clustering techniques”, Electronics &                
          Communication Engineering Journal, March/April 1989, pp. 93-                
          100.                                                                        


               Claim 1 stands rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as obvious               
          over McColl in view of Walowit.  Claims 2 and 3 stand rejected              
          under § 103 as obvious over AAPA in view of Walowit. Rather                 







Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007