Appeal No. 1997-4116 Page 12 Application No. 08/589,826 to the need, it mentions neither identifying a damaged page frame nor placing a corresponding page frame in another storage element into a non-preferred state so that it cannot hold fixed data. In addition, an aside of the specification teaches that "some operating ystems ... provide the capability to dynamically change storage from non-preferred to preferred ...." (Id.) The aside does not teach that the dynamic capability solves the need; moreover, it mentions neither identifying a damaged page frame nor placing a corresponding page frame in another storage element into a non-preferred state so that it cannot hold fixed data. Moore does not cure this deficiency. The examiner admits that the reference omits a "teaching of changing a state of an entity based upon its relationship to another entity." (Examiner’s Answer at 8.) For the foregoing reasons, we are not persuaded that the prior art would have suggested identifying a damaged page frame and placing a corresponding page frame in another storage element into a non-preferred state so that it cannotPage: Previous 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007