Appeal No. 1997-4129
Application 08/237,988
For the reasons stated above, we conclude that a
prima facie case of obviousness exists with respect to
claims 1, 4, 7, and 8. Accordingly, the rejection of
claims 1, 4, 7, and 8 is sustained.
No time period for taking any subsequent action in
connection with this appeal may be extended under 37 CFR
§ 1.136(a).
AFFIRMED
ERROL A. KRASS )
Administrative Patent Judge )
)
)
)
) BOARD OF
PATENT
LEE E. BARRETT ) APPEALS
Administrative Patent Judge ) AND
) INTERFERENCES
)
)
)
ANITA PELLMAN GROSS )
Administrative Patent Judge )
- 12 -
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007