Ex parte HORI - Page 1




                         THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION                                   
                  The opinion in support of the decision being entered                                  
                  today (1) was not written for publication in a law                                    
                  journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.                                
                                                                            Paper No. 24                


                          UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                     
                                          ________________                                              
                               BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                       
                                         AND INTERFERENCES                                              
                                          ________________                                              
                                     Ex parte TOSHIKAZU HORI                                            
                                          ________________                                              
                                       Appeal No. 1997-4190                                             
                                    Application No. 08/221,721                                          
                                          ________________                                              
                                               ON BRIEF                                                 
                                          ________________                                              

            Before KRASS, JERRY SMITH, and DIXON, Administrative Patent                                 
            Judges.                                                                                     
            KRASS, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                         


                                         DECISION ON APPEAL                                             


                  This is a decision on appeal from the final rejection of                              
            claims 1 through 6 and 8 through 20, all of the claims pending                              
            in the application.                                                                         
                                                  -1-                                                   





Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007