as unpatentable over Kiyota in view of the admitted prior art and Klein is not sustained.
In re Rouffet, 149 F.3d 1350, 1357, 47 USPQ2d 1453, 1458 (Fed. Cir. 1998).
DECISION
The rejection of claim 1 under 35 U.S.C. § 102(b) as being anticipated by Kiyota is
affirmed.
The rejection of claim 3 under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as being unpatentable over
Kiyota in view of the admitted prior art and Klein is affirmed.
The rejection of claims 2 and 4 through 6 under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as being
unpatentable over Kiyota in view of the admitted prior art and Klein is reversed.
The decision of the examiner is affirmed in part.
6
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007