Appeal No. 1997-4279
Application No. 08/486,702
the transferring means," as now claimed. Since the evidence
proffered by the examiner would not have been suggestive of
the noted feature of claim 15, the rejection thereof must be
reversed.
In summary, this panel of the board has:
affirmed the rejection of claims 1 through 5, 7, 11
through 13, and 27 through 30 under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being
unpatentable over the German reference in view of Klebanow;
affirmed the rejection of claim 14 under 35 U.S.C. § 103
as being unpatentable over the German reference in view of
Klebanow and Pulskamp; and
reversed the rejection of claim 15 under 35 U.S.C. § 103
as being unpatentable over the German reference in view of
Klebanow and Wahnschaff.
The decision of the examiner is affirmed-in-part.
11
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007