Ex parte PERNER et al. - Page 2




         Appeal No. 1997-4300                                                    
         Application 08/518,719                                                  
         102(b) as being anticipated by Miller or Tzschoppe or Noel, is          
         reversed.                                                               
                      _______________   .   ______________                       


                               Memorandum Opinion                                
              The examiner has not shown that each of Miller (U.S.               
         Patent No. 4,130,527) or Tzschoppe (U.S. Patent No. 4,077,135)          
         discloses a connector which connects a polymerization reactor,          
         a cooling device, and a vacuum unit to one another, as                  
         required by appellants’ claim 4.  The examiner also has not             
         shown that each of Miller or Tzschoppe discloses a tube that            
         connects the connector to the vacuum unit at a point between            
         the polymerization reactor and the cooling device, as also              
         required by appellant’s claim 4.  The examiner presented a              
         position regarding claims 2 and 3.  Since claims 2 and 3                
         depend upon independent claim 4, and in view of the fact the            
         examiner has failed to present a proper anticipation rejection          
         with respect to claim 4, the merits of the examiner’s position          
         need not be                                                             






                                        2                                        





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007