Appeal No. 1997-4345 Application No. 08/292,670 that the stable free radical groups encompassed thereby must possess this characteristic. In re Sneed, 710 F.2d 1544, 1548, 218 USPQ 385, 388 (Fed. Cir. 1983). Particularly as so interpreted, the appealed claims cannot be regarded as anticipated by or obvious over the applied prior art as correctly argued by the appellants. This is because neither Tong nor Georges contains any teaching or suggestion that the groups located at the ends of the polymer chains disclosed in these references are thermally labile, reversibly attachable, covalently bonded stable free radical groups of the type under consideration. Moreover, the crosslinking scheme disclosed by Tong with respect to his polymer chain militates against the examiner’s position that patentee’s end groups correspond to those required by the appealed claims. It appears to be the examiner’s view (e.g., see the supplemental examiner’s answer mailed June 28, 1996) that the appellants should be required to submit evidence which shows that the here claimed polymers are indeed different from those of Tong or Georges as argued in their briefs. As previously explained, however, it is the examiner’s initial burden of 5Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007