Ex parte MILLER et al. - Page 10




          Appeal No. 1997-4354                                                        
          Application 08/177,296                                                      


          Whereas we will not sustain the rejection of independent                    
          claims 1 and 8, we will not sustain the rejection of claims 2, 3            
          and 5-7, which depend from claim 1, or of claims 9, 10, 12-14 and           
          22, which depend from claim 8, as anticipated by or obvious over            
          Diefendorff.                                                                
          Summary                                                                     
          The rejection of claims 15-21 under 35 U.S.C. § 112, second                 
          paragraph, is reversed.                                                     
          The rejection of claims 15-21 under 35 U.S.C. § 101 is                      
          reversed.                                                                   
          The rejection of claims 15, 20 and 21 under 35 U.S.C. §                     
          102(b) as anticipated by Diefendorff is affirmed.                           
          The rejection of claims 1-3, 5, 8-10, 12, 16-19 and 22 under                
          35 U.S.C. § 102(b) as anticipated by Diefendorff is reversed.               
          The rejection of claims 6, 7, 13 and 14 under 35 U.S.C.                     
          § 103 as being unpatentable over Diefendorff is reversed.                   










                                            10                                        




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007