THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today
(1) was not written for publication in a law journal and
(2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 10
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
_______________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
_______________
Ex parte R. B. GUPTA
and ROBERT G. LEES
______________
Appeal No. 1997-43651
Application 08/469,726
_______________
ON BRIEF
_______________
Before GARRIS, WARREN and WALTZ, Administrative Patent Judges.
WARREN, Administrative Patent Judge.
Decision on Appeal and Opinion
This is an appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the decision of the examiner finally rejecting
claims 14 through 22. Claims 23 through 32 are also of record and stand withdrawn from2
consideration by the examiner under 37 CFR § 1.142(b).
We will not sustain the ground of rejection of claims 14 through 22 under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as
1We decide concurrently herewith Appeal No. 1996-0191 in application 08/001,697, filed January 7,
1993, which according to appellants is the parent of the present application.
2Amendment of June 6, 1995 (Paper No. 2).
- 1 -
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007