THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1)
was not written for publication in a law journal and (2) is
not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 64
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
_____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
_____________
Ex parte CAMPBELL H. STEKETEE, JR.
_____________
Appeal No. 1997-4430
Application 08/421,4631
______________
HEARD: January 10, 2000
_______________
Before COHEN, STAAB and BAHR, Administrative Patent Judges.
COHEN, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is an appeal from the final rejection of claims 39
through 41 and 60 through 66. Claims 15 through 18 have been
1 Application for patent filed April 12, 1995. According
to appellant, this application is a continuation of
Application 08/010,522, filed January 25, 1993, now abandoned,
which is a continuation of Application 07/808,305, filed
December 16, 1991, now abandoned, which is a continuation of
Application 07/180,904, filed April 13, 1988, now abandoned,
which is a continuation-in-part of Application 07/076,973,
filed July 28, 1987, now U.S. Patent No. 4,867,921, issued
September 19, 1989, which is a continuation of Application
06/846,322, filed March 31, 1986, now abandoned.
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007