THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered
today (1) was not written for publication in a law
journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the
Board.
Paper No. 23
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte SHUICHI NAGANO
and TAKASHI KANAI
____________
Appeal No. 1997-4447
Application No. 08/309,907
____________
ON BRIEF
____________
Before THOMAS, HAIRSTON and JERRY SMITH, Administrative Patent
Judges.
THOMAS, Administrative Patent Judge.
ON REQUEST FOR REHEARING
In a paper filed on July 24, 2000, bearing a certificate
of mailing date of July 18, 2000, appellants request that we
rehear our decision dated May 18, 2000, wherein we sustained
the rejection of claims 9, 10 and 12 under 35 U.S.C. § 102.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007