Ex parte NAGANO et al. - Page 1




                    THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION                      

               The opinion in support of the decision being entered                   
               today (1) was not written for publication in a law                     
               journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the                        
               Board.                                                                 
                                                               Paper No. 23           
                      UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                       
                                    ____________                                      
                         BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                           
                                  AND INTERFERENCES                                   
                                    ____________                                      
                               Ex parte SHUICHI NAGANO                                
                                and TAKASHI KANAI                                     
                                    ____________                                      
                                Appeal No. 1997-4447                                  
                             Application No. 08/309,907                               
                                    ____________                                      
                                      ON BRIEF                                        
                                    ____________                                      

          Before THOMAS, HAIRSTON and JERRY SMITH, Administrative Patent              
          Judges.                                                                     
          THOMAS, Administrative Patent Judge.                                        


                               ON REQUEST FOR REHEARING                               
               In a paper filed on July 24, 2000, bearing a certificate               
          of mailing date of July 18, 2000, appellants request that we                
          rehear our decision dated May 18, 2000, wherein we sustained                
          the rejection of claims 9, 10 and 12 under 35 U.S.C.  102.                 








Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007