Ex parte VINCIARELLI et al. - Page 3




          Appeal No. 98-0130                                            Page 3            
          Application No. 08/631,793                                                      


               the first and second circuit assemblies being                              
          mechanically separable as assemblies from one another,                          
          galvanically isolated from one another, and configured to be                    
          placed in positions relative to one another to enable said                      
          primary-side and secondary-side communicators to cooperate to                   
          pass said control information,                                                  
               said primary-side communicator and said secondary-side                     
          communicator being electromagnetically coupled by windings for                  
          passing said control information on said carrier.                               
               The prior art references of record relied upon by the                      
          examiner in rejecting the appealed claims are:                                  
               Snow et al (Snow)          4,683,528                 Jul. 28,              
          1997                                                                            
               Gillett et al (Gillett) 4,868,732                    Sep. 19,              
          1989                                                                            
               Claims 1, 2, 4-12, 15-17, 19-24, and 42 stand rejected                     
          under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being unpatentable over Snow in view                   
          of Gillett.                                                                     
               Rather than reiterate the conflicting viewpoints advanced                  
          by the examiner and the appellants regarding the above-noted                    
          rejections, we make reference to the final rejection (Paper                     
          No. 18, mailed July 30, 1996) and the examiner's answer (Paper                  
          No. 25, mailed July 3, 1997) for the examiner's complete                        
          reasoning in support of the rejections, and to the appellants’                  
          brief (Paper No. 24, filed March 31, 1997) and reply brief                      










Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007