Appeal No. 1998-0165
Application 08/566,270
frequency,” appellant’s disclosed embodiment requires resistor
R and capacitor C for the same purpose -- as circuit28 21
elements in addition to the transistor which are necessary to
yield the “first” and the “second” impedance.
Since appellant has failed to show that the examiner
erred in the finding of anticipation, we sustain the rejection
of Claims 1 and 10 over Anderson. We also sustain the
rejection of the claims dependent on 1 and 10, as appellant
has not argued their limitations separately.
CONCLUSION
The rejection of Claims 1-6, 10, 11, 14, and 17-19 is
affirmed.
- 9 -9
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007