The opinion in support of the decision being
entered today is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper 19
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
_____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
_____________
Ex parte MICHAEL E. RORABAUGH,
DARRYL F. GARRIGUS and JURIS VERZEMNIEKS
_____________
Appeal 1998-0186
Application 08/464,1491
______________
Before: McKELVEY, Senior Administrative Patent Judge, and SCHAFER and GARDNER-LANE,
Administrative Patent Judges.
SCHAFER, Administrative Patent Judge.
Applicants appeal from the final rejection of claims 20-32. We have jurisdiction pursuant ot 35
U.S.C. § 134.
1 Application for patent filed 5 June 1995. The application on appeal is based on a division of application 08/209,847, filed
11 March 1994, which is a continuation in part of application 08/040,217, filed 1 April 1993, which is a continuation in part of
application 07/945,191, filed 15 September 1992. .
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007