Ex Parte GLAUG et al - Page 1




                                  THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION                                                          
                The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written for publication in                       
                a law journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.                                                            
                                                                                                Paper No. 14                            

                                   UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                                            
                                                             __________                                                                 
                                         BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                                             
                                                      AND INTERFERENCES                                                                 
                                                             __________                                                                 
                                    Ex parte FRANK S. GLAUG and MARGARET A. KATO                                                        
                                                             __________                                                                 
                                                       Appeal No. 1998-0243                                                             
                                                       Application 08/455,374                                                           
                                                            ___________                                                                 
                                                              ON BRIEF                                                                  
                                                            ___________                                                                 

                Before CALVERT, FRANKFORT and BAHR, Administrative Patent Judges.                                                       
                CALVERT, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                                                   

                                                      DECISION ON APPEAL                                                                
                        This is an appeal from the final rejection of claims 1 to 25, all the claims in the                             
                application.                                                                                                            
                        The claims on appeal are drawn to a process for making disposable absorbent articles,                           
                disclosed as being training pants for children.  Claims 1 to 25 are reproduced in the appendix of                       
                appellants’ brief.                                                                                                      

                                                                   1                                                                    





Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007