Appeal No. 1998-0249
Application No. 08/534,100
two groups of holes as in the Shibano disclosure. We have
considered the other references in the examiner’s rejection
and find that they do not ameliorate the shortcomings we have
discussed with respect to Shibano, Kato, Martens and Chau.
6
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007