Ex parte MALEY - Page 1




                             The opinion in support of the decision being entered today                                  
                               (1) was not written for publication in a law journal and                                  
                                      (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.                                         
                                                                                     Paper No. 10                        
                              UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                                  
                                                   _____________                                                         
                                   BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                                    
                                               AND INTERFERENCES                                                         
                                                   _____________                                                         
                                             Ex parte FRANK M. MALEY                                                     
                                                   _____________                                                         
                                                Appeal No. 1998-0254                                                     
                                              Application No. 08/511,257                                                 
                                                   ______________                                                        
                                                      ON BRIEF                                                           
                                                  _______________                                                        
              Before CALVERT,  FRANKFORT and PATE,  Administrative Patent Judges.                                        
              PATE, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                                         

                                               DECISION ON APPEAL                                                        
                     This is an appeal from the final rejection of claims 1 through 3, 5, 10 through 13, 19              
              and 20.  These are all the claims remaining in the application.                                            
                     The claimed invention is directed to a child-proof bucket assembly for a mop                        
              bucket.  The bucket has a lid to cover the open top of the container with a slot extending                 
              from the peripheral edge of the lid.  The slot is from 1 to 2 inches wide and is sized to                  
              receive the handle of the mop, but not to permit the mophead from coming through the slot.                 
                     The claimed subject matter may be further understood with reference to the                          

                                                           1                                                             





Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007