THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered
today (1) was not written for publication in a law
journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 21
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte JOERG-SIEGFRIED BLECK
AND MICHAEL GEBEL
____________
Appeal No. 1998-0292
Application No. 08/209,633
____________
HEARD: March 9, 2000
____________
Before JERRY SMITH, LALL, and FRAHM, Administrative Patent
Judges.
LALL, Administrative Patent Judge.
This is a decision on appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from
the Examiner's final rejection of claims 1 to 22, which1
constitute all the claims in the application.
The disclosed invention relates to a method for imaging
an area of investigation by means of a source half-tone picture
1An amendment after the final rejection was filed [paper
no. 10] and was entered in the record [paper no. 11].
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007