Ex parte VAN ENGELSHOVEN et al. - Page 1




               The opinion in support of the decision being entered                   
          today was not written for publication and is not precedent of               
          the Board.                                                                  

                                                            Paper No. 19              


                      UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                       
                                     __________                                       
                         BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                           
                                  AND INTERFERENCES                                   
                                     __________                                       
                  Ex parte JEROEN VAN ENGELSHOVEN, EDWIN A. MONTIE,                   
                           ADRIANUS H.E. VAN RIJSEWIJK and                            
                               JOHANNES TH. PEERLINGS                                 
                                     __________                                       
                                Appeal No. 1998-0335                                  
                               Application 08/518,061                                 
                                     ___________                                      
                                      ON BRIEF                                        
                                     ___________                                      
          Before THOMAS, JERRY SMITH and BARRY, Administrative Patent                 
          Judges.                                                                     
          JERRY SMITH, Administrative Patent Judge.                                   

                                 DECISION ON APPEAL                                   
          This is a decision on the appeal under 35 U.S.C.  134                      
          from the examiner’s rejection of claims 7-11.  Claims 1-6 have              
          been canceled, and claim 12 has been indicated to contain                   
          allowable subject matter.  An amendment after final rejection               
          was filed on March 31, 1997 but was denied entry by the                     
                                          1                                           





Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007