The opinion in support of the decision being entered
today was not written for publication and is not precedent of
the Board.
Paper No. 19
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
__________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
__________
Ex parte JEROEN VAN ENGELSHOVEN, EDWIN A. MONTIE,
ADRIANUS H.E. VAN RIJSEWIJK and
JOHANNES TH. PEERLINGS
__________
Appeal No. 1998-0335
Application 08/518,061
___________
ON BRIEF
___________
Before THOMAS, JERRY SMITH and BARRY, Administrative Patent
Judges.
JERRY SMITH, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on the appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134
from the examiner’s rejection of claims 7-11. Claims 1-6 have
been canceled, and claim 12 has been indicated to contain
allowable subject matter. An amendment after final rejection
was filed on March 31, 1997 but was denied entry by the
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007