Appeal No. 1998-0357
Application 08/258,429
Claim 4 depends from claim 3 and further requires the
wall structure to define an upper wall, a side wall, and first
and second transverse walls, wherein the upper, side and first
transverse walls define in part the first passage and the
first transverse wall separates the first and second passages.
Since there is nothing in the applied references which would
have suggested a table assembly having this particular wall
structure, we shall not sustain the standing 35 U.S.C. §
103(a) rejection of claim 4, or claims 6 and 7 which depend
therefrom, as being unpatentable over Newhouse in view of
Grund, taken with or without Arnold.
Claim 9 recites a table assembly comprising a cover
movably mounted to the power supply system housing and
releasably engaged with the lower surface of the table top.
Since there is nothing in the applied references which would
have suggested a table assembly having such a cover, we shall
not sustain the standing 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) rejection of claim
9, or of claims 10 and 11 which depend therefrom, as being
unpatentable over Newhouse in view of Grund, taken with or
without Arnold.
7
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007