The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not
written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 17
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte EDWIN A. MONTIE, JEROEN VAN ENGELSHOVEN,
and RONALD VAN DER WILK
____________
Appeal No. 1998-0380
Application No. 08/518,062
____________
ON BRIEF
____________
Before COHEN, ABRAMS, and BARRETT, Administrative Patent Judges.
COHEN, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is an appeal from the final rejection of claims
1 through 3, 5, and 6. These claims constitute all of the
claims remaining in the application.
Appellants’ invention pertains to a cathode ray tube. A
basic understanding of the invention can be derived from a
reading of exemplary claim 1, a copy of which appears in the
appendix to the main brief (Paper No. 13).
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007