Ex parte MONTIE et al. - Page 1




                The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not    
                written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.    
                                                                 Paper No. 17         
                       UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                      
                                     ____________                                     
                          BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                          
                                  AND INTERFERENCES                                   
                                     ____________                                     
                   Ex parte EDWIN A. MONTIE, JEROEN VAN ENGELSHOVEN,                  
                               and RONALD VAN DER WILK                                
                                     ____________                                     
                                 Appeal No. 1998-0380                                 
                              Application No. 08/518,062                              
                                     ____________                                     
                                       ON BRIEF                                       
                                     ____________                                     


          Before COHEN, ABRAMS, and BARRETT, Administrative Patent Judges.            
          COHEN, Administrative Patent Judge.                                         


                                  DECISION ON APPEAL                                  
               This is an appeal from the final rejection of claims                   
          1 through 3, 5, and 6.  These claims constitute all of the                  
          claims remaining in the application.                                        


               Appellants’ invention pertains to a cathode ray tube.  A               
          basic understanding of the invention can be derived from a                  
          reading of exemplary claim 1, a copy of which appears in the                
          appendix to the main brief (Paper No. 13).                                  







Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007