Ex parte HARUYAMA - Page 1



                                                       Paper No. 39                   

               THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION                           
          The opinion in support of the decision being entered today                  
          (1) was not written for publication in a law journal and                    
          (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.                                  

                       UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                      
                                    _______________                                   
                           BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                         
                                   AND INTERFERENCES                                  
                                    _______________                                   
                               Ex parte HIROYUKI HARUYAMA                             
                                     ______________                                   
                                  Appeal No. 1998-0446                                
                              Application 08/572,195                                  
                                    _______________                                   
                              HEARD: February 24, 2000                                
                                    _______________                                   
          Before KRASS, JERRY SMITH and GROSS, Administrative Patent                  
          Judges.                                                                     
          JERRY SMITH, Administrative Patent Judge.                                   
                                                                                     


                                   DECISION ON APPEAL                                 
               This is a decision on the appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from            
          the examiner’s rejection of claims 1 and 3-13, which constitute             
          all the claims remaining in the application.  An amendment after            
          final rejection was filed on February 11, 1997 and was entered by           
          the examiner.                                                               


                                            1                                         




Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007