The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board Paper No. 12 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE ____________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES ____________ Ex parte BECKY J. SCHROEDER-PERRY and CHARLES F. SCHROEDER ____________ Appeal No. 1998-0447 Application No. 08/477,893 ____________ ON BRIEF ____________ Before JERRY SMITH, FLEMING, and GROSS, Administrative Patent Judges. GROSS, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL This is a decision on appeal from the examiner's final rejection of claims 1 through 6. Claims 7 through 17 have been withdrawn from consideration as drawn to a non-elected species. Appellants' invention relates to an electroluminescent display in which light segments are activated in sequence at a frequency sufficient to give to a viewer an overall appearancePage: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007