Appeal No. 1998-0493
Application 08/364,000
Lee, Mobile Cellular Telecommunications Systems, McGraw-Hill
Book Company, pages 77, 84 and 85.2
Claim 1 stands rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as
being unpatentable over Saito in view of Kerr or Lee.
Claim 2 stands rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as
being unpatentable over Saito in view of Kerr or Lee and
further in view of Hewitt.
Claims 3 through 6 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. §
103 as being unpatentable over Saito in view of Kerr or Lee
and further in view of Hewitt and Sato.
Rather than reiterate the arguments of Appellant and
the Examiner, reference is made to the brief, reply brief and
answer for the respective details thereof.
OPINION
substantiating the “Official Notice” portion of the final
rejection. Appellant has considered them in the reply brief.
2Although no publication date appears, Appellant has not
contested its use as prior art.
4
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007