The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not
written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 69
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte RICHARD A. FLASCK
____________
Appeal No. 1998-0495
Application No. 08/324,540
____________
HEARD: October 25, 2000
____________
Before BARRETT, DIXON, and GROSS, Administrative Patent Judges.
GROSS, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on appeal from the examiner's final
rejection of claims 8, 10 through 12, 14 through 18, 21, 24
through 28, 30 through 36, and 39 through 44, which are all of
the claims pending in this application.
Appellant's invention relates to a reflective, wafer
based, active matrix, polymer dispersed liquid crystal
(hereafter, PDLC) display used for projection. Claim 42 is
illustrative of the claimed invention, and it reads as
follows:
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007