THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written for publication in a law journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board. Paper No. 25 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE ____________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES ____________ Ex parte DANIEL E. KLAS and WILLIAM J. ROSE ____________ Appeal No. 1998-0512 Application No. 08/477,238 ____________ HEARD: March 7, 2000 ____________ Before KRASS, BARRETT, and GROSS, Administrative Patent Judges. GROSS, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL This is a decision on appeal from the examiner's final rejection of claims 11 through 27, which are all of the claims pending in this application. Appellants' invention relates to an apparatus for reducing crosstalk in a connector circuit for a communications system. In particular, first and third conductive paths and second and fourth conductive paths are capacitively coupledPage: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007