Appeal No. 1998-0578 Application 08/349,633 recited in claim 21. Accordingly, the rejection of claims 22 and 38 as being anticipated by Stanczyk also cannot be sustained. Conclusion The rejection of claims 21, 22 and 38 under 35 U.S.C. § 102(e) as being anticipated by Stanczyk is reversed. REVERSED FRED E. McKELVEY, Senior ) Administrative Patent Judge ) ) ) ) ) ) BOARD OF PATENT RICHARD E. SCHAFER ) APPEALS AND Administrative Patent Judge ) INTERFERENCES ) ) ) ) ) JAMESON LEE ) Administrative Patent Judge ) Alfred E. Hall JONES DAY REAVIS AND POGUE 2300 Trammell Crow Center 2001 Ross Avenue Dallas, TX 75201 8Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007