THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision entered today (1) was not written for publication
in a law journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 22
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
__________________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
__________________
Ex parte BAC V. PHAM
__________________
Appeal No. 1998-0587
Application 08/385,2531
________________
ON BRIEF
________________
Before McKELVEY, Senior Administrative Patent Judge, and
SCHAFER and LEE, Administrative Patent Judges.
LEE, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from
the examiner’s rejection of appellants’ claims 1-32. Claims
1, 17 and 25 are independent claims.
References relied on by the Examiner
Squires et al. Patent No. 5,121,262 June 9,
1992
(Squires)
Abbott et al. Patent No. 5,341,249 August 23,
1994
(Abbott)
1
Application for patent filed February 8, 1995.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007