Ex parte SMITH et al. - Page 2




          Appeal No. 1998-0625                                                        
          Application No. 08/570,605                                                  


               1.   An emergency auto visual communication system for                 
          exhibiting from a vehicle to an observer, comprising                        



               a computer with keyboard that controls and                             
          intercommunicates to an illuminated electronic display board;               
               the illuminated electronic display board removably                     
          attached to the inside of a rear, front, or side window of the              
          vehicle, the illuminated electronic display board displaying a              
          message that can be seen through the window upon actuation of               
          a switch mounted within the communication system powered by                 
          D.C. current from the vehicle through its cigarette lighter                 
          socket and without the use of the vehicle braking system.                   
               The prior art references of record relied upon by the                  
          examiner in rejecting the appealed claims are:                              
          Hutchison                     4,949,071                     Aug.            
          14, 1990                                                                    
          Fahs                          5,132,666                     Jul.            
          21, 1992                                                                    
               Claims 1 and 2 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 102 as                 
          being anticipated by Hutchison.                                             
               Claim 3 stands rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being                 
          unpatentable over Hutchison in view of Fahs.                                
               Reference is made to the Examiner's Answer (Paper No. 7,               
          mailed May 27, 1997) for the examiner's complete reasoning in               
          support of the rejections, and to appellants' Brief (Paper No.              


                                          2                                           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007