Appeal No. 1998-0647
Application 08/414,004
In view of the foregoing, it is clear that there can be
no clear anticipation of even the broad representative
independent claim 1 on appeal in accordance with the teachings
and showings in Kawashima. Since the feature of independent
claim 1 of "a combined motor and magnetic bearing device" etc.
is similarly reflected in each of the remaining independent
claims 2 and 10 on appeal, we must reverse the rejection of
all claims on appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 102. As such, the
decision of the examiner is reversed.
REVERSED
JAMES D. THOMAS )
Administrative Patent Judge )
)
)
)
) BOARD OF PATENT
ERROL A. KRASS ) APPEALS
Administrative Patent Judge ) AND
)
INTERFERENCES
)
)
)
6
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007