Ex parte ALMULLA - Page 7




          Appeal No. 1998-0692                                                        
          Application No. 08/693,551                                                  

          will not sustain the rejection of claims 4, 7 through 9, 12                 
          and 13 under 35 U.S.C.  102(b).                                            
               Similarly, since the rejection of claims 5, 6, 10 and 11               
          under 35 U.S.C.  103 is based on the same speculation as to                
          Gregor’s suggestion of the claimed “maximum propagation                     
          delay,” we also will not sustain the obviousness rejection.                 



























                                          7                                           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007