Ex parte OLNOWICH et al. - Page 1




                    THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION                      
          The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1)              
          was not written for publication in a law journal and (2) is                 
          not binding precedent of the Board.                                         
                                                            Paper No. 12              

                      UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                       
                                     __________                                       

                         BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                           
                                  AND INTERFERENCES                                   
                                     __________                                       

                    Ex parte HOWARD T. OLNOWICH, JEHOSHUA BRUCK,                      
          JAMES W. FEENEY and ELI UPFAL                                               
                                     __________                                       
                                Appeal No. 1998-0710                                  
                               Application 08/625,379                                 
                                     ___________                                      
                                      ON BRIEF                                        
                                     ___________                                      

          Before KRASS, JERRY SMITH and LALL, Administrative Patent                   
          Judges.                                                                     
          JERRY SMITH, Administrative Patent Judge.                                   

                                 DECISION ON APPEAL                                   
               This is a decision on the appeal under 35 U.S.C.  134                 
          from the examiner’s rejection of claims 21 and 22, which                    
          constitute the only claims remaining in the application.                    
                                          1                                           





Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007