THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1)
was not written for publication in a law journal and (2) is
not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 30
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
__________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
__________
Ex parte HANS W. BLECKMANN, HEINZ LORECK,
MICHAEL ZYDEK, WOLFGANG FEY and PETER JONES
__________
Appeal No. 1998-0711
Application 07/989,027
___________
ON BRIEF
___________
Before JERRY SMITH, BARRETT and LALL, Administrative Patent
Judges.
JERRY SMITH, Administrative Patent Judge.
This is a decision on the appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134
from the examiner’s rejection of claims 1-5, 7-12, 14 and 15,
which constitute all the claims remaining in the application.
An amendment after final rejection was filed on July 1, 1996
and was approved for entry by the examiner.
The disclosed invention pertains to a circuit
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007