Ex parte FORTIN et al. - Page 1




           The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for
                     publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.           
                                                                 Paper No. 20         
                      UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                       
                                    ____________                                      
                         BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                           
                                  AND INTERFERENCES                                   
                                    ____________                                      
                  Ex parte MICHAEL R. FORTIN and ROBERT J. URQUHART                   
                                    ____________                                      
                                Appeal No. 1998-0718                                  
                             Application No. 08/400,779                               
                                    ____________                                      
                                      ON BRIEF                                        
                                    ____________                                      
          Before HAIRSTON, JERRY SMITH and BARRY, Administrative Patent               
          Judges.                                                                     
          JERRY SMITH, Administrative Patent Judge.                                   


                                 DECISION ON APPEAL                                   
               This is a decision on the appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134                 
          from the examiner’s final rejection of claims 1, 2, 4, 7-9, 12              
          and 13, which constitute all the claims remaining in the                    
          application.  The final rejection of claims 1 and 2 is not                  
          being appealed.  Therefore, this appeal relates only to the                 
          rejection of claims 4, 7-9, 12 and 13.  An amendment after                  
          final rejection was filed on May 7, 1997 but was denied entry               
          by the examiner.                                                            







Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007