THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written for publication in a law journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board. Paper No. 23 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE __________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES __________ Ex parte TAKASHI SHIOIRI __________ Appeal No. 1998-0745 Application 08/216,8421 ___________ ON BRIEF ___________ Before URYNOWICZ, THOMAS and FLEMING, Administrative Patent Judges. URYNOWICZ, Administrative Patent Judge. Decision on Appeal This appeal is from the final rejection of claims 8-10 and 12-14, all the claims pending in the application. The invention pertains to a medical image processor. Claim 8, the sole independent claim, is illustrative and reads as follows: 8. A medical image processor for correlating and analyzing at least two comparison images, comprising: Application for patent filed March 24, 1994.1 1Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007