Appeal No. 1998-0837 Application No. 08/516,752 disclosure, since exposure to ambient air is still present during the passage of the paper from the dryer section to the calender section, and still further from the top roller to the bottom roller" (brief, page 5). We note appellants' disclosure that "[c]alender rolls were originally heated...[t]here are several practical limitations to the use of heated calender rolls... [t]he temperature of the paper sheet reaches a maximum in the dryer section of the paper machine, where heat is applied, and decreases thereafter due to convection and thermal losses to the ambient air... [t]he heat losses, and consequent temperature drop, in the paper sheet can be dramatic and the temperature drop, for example, between the dryer section and the calender section, or between two calender stacks, can be more that 20ēC, high enough that it is difficult to replace the heat through heating of the calender rolls" (specification, page 4). Rejections based on 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) must rest on a 6Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007