Ex parte ZWART et al. - Page 6




          Appeal No. 1998-0837                                                        
          Application No. 08/516,752                                                  


          disclosure, since exposure to ambient air is still present                  
          during the passage of the paper from the dryer section to the               
          calender section, and still further from the top roller to the              
          bottom roller" (brief, page 5).                                             
               We note appellants' disclosure that "[c]alender rolls                  
          were originally heated...[t]here are several practical                      
          limitations to the use of heated calender rolls... [t]he                    
          temperature of the paper sheet reaches a maximum in the dryer               
          section of the paper machine, where heat is applied, and                    
          decreases thereafter due to convection and thermal losses to                
          the ambient air... [t]he heat losses, and consequent                        
          temperature drop, in the paper sheet can be dramatic and the                
          temperature drop, for example, between the                                  




          dryer section and the calender section, or between two                      
          calender stacks, can be more that 20ēC, high enough that it is              
          difficult to replace the heat through heating of the calender               
          rolls" (specification, page 4).                                             
               Rejections based on 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) must rest on a                  

                                          6                                           






Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007