Appeal No. 1998-0866 Application No. 08/698,707 We find that modification of the Swanson device to provide an internal recording device as suggested by Brock or Goto teaches away from the objective disclosed in Swanson and would not have been an obvious modification at the time the invention was made to a person having ordinary skill in the art. Accordingly, the decision of the examiner to reject claim 1 under 35 U.S.C. § 103 is reversed. NEW GROUNDS OF REJECTION Under the authority of 37 CFR § 1.196(b), this panel of the board introduces the following new grounds of rejection as to claims 1, 4 and 5. Claims 1, 4 and 5 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being unpatentable over Brock in view of Swanson. We note that both Brock and Swanson teach recording magnetic information on a magnetic track on film in a camera. Each discuss the various types of information that may be recorded, e.g. the name of the owner of the camera, the date and/or location of the picture being taken, the camera settings (Swanson, col. 1, lines 11-37, and Brock, col. 1, lines 37-50) and the type of recording device suitable to 6Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007