THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written for publication in a law journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board. Paper No. 19 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE ____________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES ____________ Ex parte MYUNG-KEUN YEO, NAM-SU LEE, YOUNG-TAIK LIM and DAE-SUL SIM ____________ Appeal No. 1998-0871 Application No. 08/406,301 ____________ ON BRIEF ____________ Before FLEMING, DIXON, and LEVY, Administrative Patent Judges. LEVY, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL This is a decision on appeal from the examiner's final rejection of claims 1-12, which are all of the claims pending in this application. This appeal is properly before the Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences as appellants’ claims have been finally rejected. See 35 U.S.C. § 134 and 37 CFR § 1.191(a) The appellants’ invention relates to a VCR integrated with a projector. Specifically, a switching part (50) selects a signal from either a VCR (30) or a TV tuner (20) in response to a signalPage: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007