Ex parte YEO et al. - Page 1




                               THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION                                                        

                                   The opinion in support of the decision being entered today                                      
                                     (1) was not written for publication in a law journal and                                      
                                           (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.                                              

                                                                                                      Paper No. 19                 

                                  UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                                        
                                                         ____________                                                              

                                       BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                                          
                                                    AND INTERFERENCES                                                              
                                                         ____________                                                              

                  Ex parte MYUNG-KEUN YEO, NAM-SU LEE, YOUNG-TAIK LIM and DAE-SUL SIM                                              
                                                         ____________                                                              

                                                     Appeal No. 1998-0871                                                          
                                                   Application No. 08/406,301                                                      
                                                         ____________                                                              

                                                           ON BRIEF                                                                
                                                         ____________                                                              

               Before FLEMING, DIXON, and LEVY, Administrative Patent Judges.                                                      
               LEVY, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                                                  


                                                   DECISION ON APPEAL                                                              

                       This is a decision on appeal from the examiner's final rejection of claims 1-12, which are all of           

               the claims pending in this application. This appeal is properly before the Board of Patent Appeals and              

               Interferences as appellants’ claims have been finally rejected. See 35 U.S.C.  134 and 37 CFR                     

               1.191(a)                                                                                                            

                       The appellants’ invention relates to a VCR integrated with a projector.  Specifically, a                    

               switching part (50) selects a signal from either a VCR (30) or a TV tuner (20) in response to a signal              






Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007