THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today
(1) was not written for publication in a law journal and
(2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 19
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte MYUNG-KEUN YEO, NAM-SU LEE, YOUNG-TAIK LIM and DAE-SUL SIM
____________
Appeal No. 1998-0871
Application No. 08/406,301
____________
ON BRIEF
____________
Before FLEMING, DIXON, and LEVY, Administrative Patent Judges.
LEVY, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on appeal from the examiner's final rejection of claims 1-12, which are all of
the claims pending in this application. This appeal is properly before the Board of Patent Appeals and
Interferences as appellants’ claims have been finally rejected. See 35 U.S.C. § 134 and 37 CFR §
1.191(a)
The appellants’ invention relates to a VCR integrated with a projector. Specifically, a
switching part (50) selects a signal from either a VCR (30) or a TV tuner (20) in response to a signal
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007